The Underground Librarian

What cats do before meeting curiosity sellers….

Posts Tagged ‘AETA 4’

Writing: As requested

Posted by N. A. Jones on May 31, 2015

Caveats: #1 Thank you dear anonymous+ for the encouragement. These never would have seen the light of day till I got back to a project over 15 years old (i.e. Never.) #2 You find in portion of the writing, a woman is the focus. In no way interpret this as lesbianism. After a series of classes in college and reading elsewhere I became fascinated with the ancient practice of Courtly Love. (I still do not have a solid hold on it) In any case I wrote from the viewpoint of a knight before he left for the battle fronts during a Crusade. His confusion to bear children by love or staying true to his love and obligations to Christ are a internal war I explore in other writings as well. Meanwhile several bodiless characters develop that need to be fleshed out for later. Meanwhile I feel like O’Keefe battling Stiegliz over his interpretation of her flowers as overtly sexual. For sure, all art is not all pornography. Lastly, I’ve got several more editing passes to make till I’m through. I prefer to wait till the last to post again. Ah, Yes! All hail the process.

#1

My blessed blessed,
Come to me tonight
with larkspur trailing in your hair
and the song that dwells in the caverns of your anchored breast.
Let us reap the pleasures of
conversation, glimpse the wan flesh of
an earlobe, and the drawn line circling your wrist.

#2

Of the speech on my lips
is the prayer of anger gone?
Voices bellow in low toned melody from minarets
That seems laden with sand and silt from the rivers
and dungeon pits across the Southern banks.

#3

I repent for days of joy.
I repent for the eye that is fooled.
I repent for respect falsely contributed.
I bow to that which is greater.
I forsake that which grieves.
I pass on so that none may forget.
I live so that our days may be done.
#4

Even if he hates, forsakes, and does not live
in grace,
you must take up for him.
Even as the gods finally forsake him, as they
leaven anger, spite, and drool committing to their own devices.
Cursed be flesh upon flesh upon lie upon depressed mind.
Even then you must aid and forgive him.

#5

Let my shadow follow you son till the journey night breaks.
Let nothing foul,
Let no carrion fall in our wake
Let my shadow fall upon you son
And let no buzzard mistake you for slake.

#6

We implore the great god of mysteries
Who is a wellspring font buried below water rock hewn pools and slate.
We beseech this one wish:
That we may enter the hearts of men
To find those challenged at heart
and striving in weakness to blood, bone, and temple honed,
Searching for kindness
in raw form, cherishing all divine and pleasing to your senses.
Let us find in these hearts of men, women, child, and being;
Honor, faith, and courage imbedded in and of the flesh.

#7

Considering the life of a flasher: one must question his motivation. One must try to see his point of view. For if there is that much eroticism in the world, shouldn’t we all take part?

#8

At night the drum beat low and the only other man slept in shifts. Then Bartholomew would prattle on about the beauty of Africa, the women, the lush greenery, and the lands

#9

Open’s a house
Two’s a mouse
Three’s a “How do you do?”
4s a mole
5 ever more
when owned what do you do?

One’s a house
Twos a mouse
3s a “how do you do?”
5s heaven then
6 Please and thank you

1s a house
2s a mouse
3s heaven sent
If we go to Devonshire all our money’s spent,
Rolling on the ground, making angels as we go.
Getting crazy stares from traveller’s shouting,
“You’re supposed to do that in snow!”

#10

pure and driven clean people
having no idea of fiendish deeds
introducing ideas that “make them go bad”.
Makes me consider what would cause a man to go mad?

Clean cloth and pepper
What’d you do to depress’er
White sheet and braun
What ever do go wrong
How did she think life would start
With still born hand and defeated heart?

#11

My blessed blessed,
May you only see me
By moonlight gaze eened out between
Mist and fog on low land
Next to soft petalled peonies
And bruised lemon grass

My blessed blessed come to me
Under rows of jasmine
And
You
Aromatic of almond oiled skin
Let my eyes fall upon your bare brow
Following the curve
Of your nose down to those lips
And let me think
Once.
Twice.
Thrice reconsider but not pursue.
Still not stare, for even
In those thoughts
I bring disgrace upon both our souls
For that kiss without touch ever leads the
Most holy astray into follies
Of carnal flesh.

What my blessed
Can I endure?
This passage of rights.
This new movement.
It takes all of me
and includes my love for you.
Shall I be found for you, my dearest and only?
We shall

Nothing so great, so fine, couyld get a woman pregnant.

#12

So few find in this mortal coil
A want to forgive and smile
And fine in ways to have more than happiness
And more than you

#13
Belief is what we call a temporary state of suppression of childhood
Once that is reached then and only then can the converted become the believer then a true believer, then a doer then one who knows only then the known becomes the dutiful

#14
How can I honestly say she likes me?
How often have you had sex, she asked.
By the intent in your eye, not enough.

#15
Jungar brought arms.
We weren’t sure we’d need them, but we became more convinced as he told us about the pirates
Three by sea and one besides me.
Three in a raft: one by stern,
Two in the galley, and one by the rudder.
Three by sea and one besides me.
We set sail under a burgeoning wind.
North by northwest a gale burdoned
with salt water. We were born by fresh water lakes,
sailed by gentle winds, and travailed by broad banded storms
We in search of taller trees, canopies,
higher cloud covered skies,
sharper mountain tops,
whiter cloud peaks,
sculpted water ridden vallies,
deeper reflective lakes,
and billowing bushes with shifting reaches.

So we emplore thee
old Gods of the Mye!

There is magic when the stars
show and tell you how to sail away
and home again.
Sailors have always known where
The Pleadis sleep and what the
Western Nebulae claws at.

#16

Albigensian Creed

Tout votre sanc de3vez espandre
Pour la sainte Englise defender
– Lordere de Chevalerie

Wandering naked in the cold
I too wonder what to seek to keep chattering bones warm.
Fear of God?
Love of Christ?
Great Mother Mary save me from displeasure to thee
“Thou shalt believe all that the church teaches and shall obey all her commandments”

I’ve come half a world
Only to find love resides in the breast of a Moor.
Dare I ask what hides behind silk covered tresses?
I seek to war
with Moorish Kingdoms,
yet I find only peace and understanding.
I am a knight, young, virile, yet, eeking out progress
to the flesh.

“Never think of serving God, never tell the truth. If you meet with and honest man, dishounor him. Burn down town, village, houses, over thrown altar and break crucifixes”
-Amis et Amiles, Hadre

“It appears to be simple, but it is not. How often do you get the chance to do something about it.”
“Nothing came of it,” said Lucius, “nothing good at all. Still we made the trek. Pilgrimmage is what you will to her door.”
Laughing and talking all the way wondering if this High Muck-Muck was real. “Neither sweat, nor stain, nor belches shall keep us from appointed round. Shall we bring cakes of other offerings from the sea? Land? Air? Shall we sing praises of God, Goddess, or Demi-urges long gone past their prime? Shall we adorn her with flowers? All I can think about is after that weary journey to her door, some hospitality will be had by us and all. I hope.”
“Way out. Way out past the forest, grasslands, and desert is the woman I see myself by drawing.”
#17
If we speak of shoes and ship and sealing wax
Will pigs not follow?
If we speak of each other
Fecund , sweat drenched, and taled of woe,
Shall we arise only succumbed
By summer’s heat and humidity?

Summer hierarchies
Give sway to banners and manners;
All made of cotton and silk.
For they are
Lightweight and easy to disrobe.

Whispered:
If I took you to my bed…
What would happen?
Blushed:
Nothing.

Toungues langoured by the sunshine
Shall only speak of watery ways
The curve of the head and the lithe of a creek ever flowering between
and the eyes will cry salt over the
sight of fresh streams.
#18
Courtly Love

A fancy in many a tale
A truth but drops from my lips
Only to touch the ground longing to fly into the hand of my lover
Piqued and wan that less in gender
and so low may I be when away
from my blessed blessed.
Her hair, her hands, her breadth, her presence
Give me strength in all of these endeavors
to proceed into other arrays.

What more can I write?
My love for her grows with every passing minute.
Day, full;
Moon, night.
Abundance overflows in pleasure with one kiss to the hand, a
most gratuitous and flattering act of desperation.

Carth cart knew the rule of love was only a fancy.
War was reality.
Nothing but god in the heart.
Nothing but soul to give.
Beyond god?
Beyond all hope of recognition, courtly love could bring a kinght’s soul to blossom
A gracious and beautiful young woman who’s been taught how to gird a young man’s inclinations to the point that it competes with god for a seat at his heart.

They assume what I want is not nobility born of a clear mind.
They assume what I seek is petty and frivolous.
They forget the emotional pain and simplicity of desire,
born of fear,
fear of being left,
fear of my own people,
fear of being homeless,
fear of starving,
and a gentle fear of what I will become.
Lest no thought strives for something beyond an impression of guilt;
Or being racked with determination to fulfill some deep seeded need for feeling wanted by a woman.
#A
In pursuit of perfection,
In my lover’s eyes,
May I bribe, beat, and strain,
To that pinnacle and be the only one
basking in that delight.

#B
Where do I find you?
Me, ethereal; you, concrete.
My feeling surges at the breast.
No comfort for the weary at heart.
Shocked like deer in mid pose before the hunter takes aim with twine, birch and feather;
only to pass.
Why, oh why, may I only be Trioluous?
Forlorn and lost to another caress of your hands,
your arms,
your breast.

#C
How do I find thee?
Awaiting! Thou fornicator of men!
How do I find thee?
Thy upshod of dirt and suet made shit!
How do I find thee?
My rough lover in between the hollyhocks?
Girded, weighted, and torn between a
love I would never find otherwise.
My hopes and dreams of a courtly maid
made faint by the closeness of a tavern wench.

#D
Passages of sleep pass before my eyes
Deep and resounding, plentiful but evasive.

Wicked ways of farce we wrought.
Beyond this and out control of
Wicked thought
this we cry
Out of these which endeavors in which we lie.

#E
Oh Whoa! I ponder my contribution in life
Oh Lo! I have pondered my position in life
Yes again, significant I have wrought yet forgetful of all.
Moon is bright;
Day turn night;
Quenching the thirst for day.
Sun at falter,
Nights getting longer and the air has passed out of the sky.
Moon is bright; day turn night,
Old thoughts fading at the sight of stars.
Morning getting colder,
Anger’s getting older and he says it time to move on
Sun is bright, night turn day
Onward into afternoon
Quenching thirst from parched night cause of
Dusk to dawn is sweat.
Purge my belly’s fire gone wan.
Moon turns pale iris blue;
While sun blooms forth into daze.
Calm and bright
Day turn night
Onward to midnight
Quenching thirst from day
Stars turn to tea light flames
While moon turns away from blazing hearth fires.

#E
Let me turn to that which leaves by the moon.

Give me freedom to be light
When soul weighs down
Its burden
Last let that which needs to leave, go.
Lastly set my sorrows afloat,
To be dawn’s light sail in over the ocean’s edge.
Long enough to heal from a scar
Short enough that it not mar or marks.

#F

Being this brown sets me off as being recognized as white;
though I would be called such by my mannerisms
and speech by an ignorant hoard.
Being this brown sets me apart from being recognized as being just black;
though I would be called such by my mannerisms
and skin color by an ignorant hoard.
Being this brown sets me apart from an ignorant hoard.

Copyright N.C. Constantine 2015 All Rights Reserved

Posted in Writing | Tagged: , | Comments Off on Writing: As requested

AETA 4: Fractured Primer

Posted by N. A. Jones on November 29, 2009

FBI Making Visits in Santa Cruz

Fri Nov 27 2009 FBI Visiting People in Santa Cruz and Asking Questions About AETA 4

FBI Agents Visit Individual's Workplace in Oakland An article anonymously published to the newswire on November 26th reports, “the FBI has been making their rounds of intimidation in Santa Cruz recently.

“The FBI is showing up unannounced at people’s workplaces and homes, asking questions about some or all of the AETA4, as well as other groups and movements of interest.

“Know, that if you are visited by the FBI, that it is your absolute right to not speak to them. If they threaten you in any way, with charges, a subpoena or anything else, contact an attorney ASAP. When you are visited, it is vital to publicize it and let your community know ASAP.”

Read more | Know Your Rights Info | Previous coverage: FBI Agents Visit Individual’s Workplace in Oakland | Affidavit Discloses UCPD “Cause” for Raid on Long Haul Infoshop | FBI Collects DNA Samples and Issues Grand Jury Subpoena in Santa Cruz

 

Animal Rights Protesters Face Higher Sentences than Racist Cross Burners

Sep 30th, 2009 by Will Potter

sidewalk_chalkFour animal rights activists are facing charges under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act for chanting, demonstrating with masks covering their faces, and chalking defamatory slogans on the sidewalk. If convicted, the “AETA 4,”—Joseph Buddenburg, Maryam Khajavi, Nathan Pope, and Adriana Stumpo—could be sentenced to 5-10 years in prison.

The AETA 4 case is a startling example of how federal terrorism laws are being used to create new crimes targeting political activists, and astronomically increase sentences for existing crimes. For instance, Marie Mason was sentenced to nearly 22 years in prison for setting fire to empty buildings and taking precautions to not harm anyone.

Meanwhile, during a Congressional hearing on the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, the Justice Department proclaimed “we are apolitical in this.” But this is anything but apolitical. Animal rights activists could receive 5-10 years in prison, as terrorists, for not harming anyone or attempting to harm anyone. Meanwhile, take a look at what some others are facing for much more serious crimes:

According to the government, high sentences for animal rights activists are intended as a deterrent, they are intended to send a message.

What kind of message do you think this sends?

Note: Funds are needed for the AETA 4 legal defense. Please make a contribution. Go to Paypal.com and send a donation to support@aeta4.org. Or you can make a tax-deductible donation through the National Lawyers Guild Foundation. The mailing address is 132 Nassau Street, Suite 922, NY, NY 10039, please indicate AETA Defense Fund on your check.

How Does the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act Work?

Mar 3rd, 2009 by Will Potter

Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act Ad CampaignIn light of the recent arrests under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, I thought it would a good time to post this presentation I gave at William Mitchell College of Law recently.

It’s a step-by-step walkthrough of the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, with some background on the law and how it was passed. It is, of course, now outdated because the FBI has made the first arrests under the legislation. (I actually talk a bit about that in the lecture, though, in answering someone’s question about the likelihood of prosecution).

I suggest downloading the text of the AETA to have as a reference as we take a closer look.

Also, check out the new Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act landing page I created. It’s a bit sparse right now, but ‘ll be using it to compile and organize the best AETA resources and articles in one place, particularly as these court cases move forward.Also, what do you all think of posting audio of events like this? Is it useful? And do you prefer the entire talk, or just a highlight?

The AETA 4: If this is terrorism, then what isn’t?

By Blog of the National Coalition Against Censorship

While Congress has been busy protecting animals from cruelty at the expense of the First Amendment (See U.S. v Stevens) elsewhere it has been legislating away the First Amendment rights of animal cruelty protesters to protect corporate profits. 

Last month, a federal court in Northern California heard oral arguments on a motion to dismiss in United States v. Buddenberg, the first prosecution under the American Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), which was passed in November, 2006, under Congress’s interstate commerce powers.

While it is true that some animal activists engage in direct action such as breaking into laboratories to rescue animals that they feel are imminently in danger, that is not the kind of activity that was at issue here.  The indictment alleges that the defendants conspired to use interstate commerce to engage in “a course of conduct involving threats, acts of vandalism, property damage, criminal trespass, harassment, and intimidation,” that “intentionally place[d] a person in reasonable fear” of death or serious bodily injury in violation of AETA, 18 U.S.C. § 43(a).

According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, co-counsel in the case, the activities alleged in the indictment consist of little more than: chanting, leafleting, chalking on public sidewalks in front of University of California researchers’ homes, and using the internet to conduct research on the activities of the protested company (apparently, an abuse of interstate commerce). 

It is also telling that the defendants have only been charged with conspiracy to carry out the prohibited conduct.  Thus, many of the allegations in the indictment are lawful activities that the government is using to argue that the defendants had a criminal mindset.

The AETA greatly expanded the scope of its predecessor, the Animal Enterprise Protection Act (AEPA); both the old and new statutes were the result of a collective effort by an alliance of agricultural and bio-medical lobbying interests. While the old AEPA statute made it a crime to intentionally disrupt an “animal enterprise,” the new AETA can be invoked for real or imagined economic loss to both the “animal enterprise” as well as others doing business with it or connected to it. Thus, the new statute also crimininalizes reaching out to tertiary parties who do business with the “animal enterprise,” targeting a common strategy of many advocacy campaigns.

Most notably, the new statute makes “terrorists” out of animal rights protesters. This has alarming ramifications, for example by enabling the federal government to wiretap organizations engaged in the alleged terrorist activities. As the New York City Bar Committee on Legal Issues Pertaining to Animals has noted, the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE), on which AETA was modeled, was passed only after extensive congressional hearings into the real dangers and obstruction posed by anti-abortion protesters to women seeking abortions at clinics (and exercising their constitutional right to do so). AETA, which largely protects the loss of profits, passed with just one hearing and without a serious inquiry into risks of “eco-terrorism.” Meanwhile, the statute is much more sweeping and punitive than FACE, least of all in invoking the label of “terrorist.” It doesn’t take too much cynicism to note Congress’s own ideological priorities.

In any case, as with many First Amendment claims, the important question is what we might be too afraid to say as a consequence of the threat of a criminal prosecution. It is true that the statute has a “savings clause,” which exempts protected lawful, “peaceful” First Amendment activity from the scope of the statute, but this is a circular argument – the conduct in question is lawful unless it is unlawful. This is hardly a reassurance that we won’t be penalized for speech when we seek to protest anything outside an establishment or operation might be possibly be construed as an “animal enterprise.”

A look at the statute and its implications for the defendants of United States v. Buddenberg (the “AETA 4” reveals some of the ways in which 18 U.S.C. § 43(a) has the potential to chill speech:

The statute is overbroad, because it focuses on economic damage such as the loss of profit not threat to human life as the measure of prohibited conduct; this extends far beyond what one might commonly conceive of as “terrorism” and strikes at the heart of most lawful animal rights activity. As critics point out, the statute could conceivably apply if someone sends emails advocating the boycott of a grocery store, thereby intentionally seeking the loss of profit, in protest of stocking a certain product.  The type of businesses that are considered “animal enterprise” has been greatly expanded from farm and research facilities under the AEPA to encompass to what appears to be virtually any commercial establishment that “uses or sells animals or animal products for profit, food or fiber production, agriculture, education, research or testing,” i.e. restaurants and clothing stores.

The statute is vague because it fails to define key terms that have implications for protected First Amendment activity. For example, the statute fails to define what it means to “interfere” and cause “damage” to qualify as an offense.  If one were to use a common law definition, an attempt to impact a company’s reputation could be punishable. Thus, the defendants argue that there is no way for individuals to know if they are engaged in activities for which there are criminal penalties or whether they are still within the ambit of protected First Amendment activity. This uncertainty has the potential to make us think twice before speaking at all.

The AETA raises penalties for activities that are already covered under existing statutes for criminal trespass, vandalism, and true threats, when that conduct hinges on speech critical of an “animal enterprise.” Thus, the AETA is a content-based regulation, generally permissible under the First Amendment only where there is a compelling interest and the regulations must closely fit the purpose of the statute. The vague and overbroad nature of the statute, however, violate these requirements of First Amendment jurisprudence.

The absurd possibilities for AETA criminal prosecutions are only laughable until one remembers the agricultural disparagement laws, the so-called veggie libel laws, which were also designed to protect corporate profits of the agri-business at the expense of speech. After six years of litigation and a million dollars in attorneys’ fees, Oprah Winfrey finally emerged victorious from a lawsuit filed against her by Texas cattlemen for a show on the mad cow disease epidemic.  Such statutes are a form of pre-emptive censorship for anyone who might want to inform the public about specific concerns regarding food safety or animal mistreatment.

The prosecution of the AETA 4 is proof that the statute has empowered law enforcement to label ordinary animal rights protesters into terrorists.  Oprah may be able  to afford defending her speech against corporate interests, but who else can? And while corporations are protected in their ability to profit, what valuable information do the rest of us lose in the silence?

Justice Denied: The AETA 4 and You

Image...
The following is a letter just released by one of the lawyers defending the AETA 4, Bob Bloom. The letter captures both the absurdity of the charges, and the significance of the case for the animals and all of us. For a blunt and succinct explanation of how far the FBI is willing to go to crush the more effective tactics employed by the animal liberation movement, read on.

-Peter Young
A new client of mine, a young man named Joseph Buddenberg, is one of four principled, dedicated, and non-violent animal rights activists who have been indicted in federal court in San Jose, California under a new federal statute that was intended by Congress to target unlawful and violent conduct.

The statute, effective as of 2008, is known as the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), and each of the four defendants is facing five years or more in federal prison because they are alleged to have engaged in, literally, picketing at the homes of researchers they believe cause laboratory animals to be subjected to inhumane experimentation that causes suffering, pain, and death.

Congress was cautioned that the statute would be subject to overreaching by the FBI and by prosecutors. Predictably, this case that targets non-violent and non-criminal speech is the very first prosecution the government has chosen to initiate under this new statute. (The statute can be found by Googling 18 U.S.C. 43).

I do not understate or attempt to mis-state the allegations against the defendants. One of the documents I enclose is an affidavit sworn to by the FBI agent in charge of this case. The affidavit sets forth the worst of what the FBI claims the defendants did (in fact, the affidavit mis-states the facts as to one event). As you will see from reading the affidavit, the defendants are accused of identifying and locating animal researchers and then loudly picketing on the sidewalks in front of their homes. The intent was, and is, to stop the torture and other mistreatment of animals by speaking out in a non-violent manner to shame the researchers by exposing them and their conduct to their neighbors.

This kind of activity, speaking out to expose wrongdoers, is the very essence of the First Amendment. But the offending research laboratory, the University of California, is politically very powerful, and it has apparently lobbied federal law enforcement officials to bring this prosecution. The right of non-violent activists working to protect animals is under threat, and the First Amendment rights of all of us are threatened by this prosecution as well, as the animals suffer and die painful deaths every day.

The defendants are all good people, and courageous people. I have come to know Joe, and I can tell you that he cares deeply about protecting innocent creatures and putting an end to the mistreatment and the suffering. He is not a violent person, and he is not a criminal. And he certainly is not a terrorist.

Many animal lovers and civil libertarians believe that this is an extremely important case for a number of reasons. I have been engaged in civil rights law for more than forty years, and I am truly offended by, and worried by, this prosecution. Needless to say, it impacts the four defendants, but it also imperils the rights of all of us, as well as the lab animals who are being subjected to horrific mistreatment.

The case is complex and labor-intensive. It involves a maze of legal questions regarding the constitutionality of the statute, the validity of search warrants, potential issues regarding wiretapping, and other challenging issues, including the intricacies of the law of conspiracy (one of the two counts in the indictment). The facts of the case are also complicated, encompassing some fourteen incidents in at least three counties, and there are literally dozens of witnesses for whom we must prepare…………

Posted in Terrorism | Tagged: | 4 Comments »